Sign in or 
Share this
An Analysis of the illustrations by Maurice Sendak
|
liangsoon |
Latest page update: made by liangsoon
, May 21 2007, 9:10 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by liangsoon
1 widget added 1 widget deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
460616
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| masabo | Comparison of Drawings | 0 | May 25 2007, 3:49 AM EDT by masabo | ||
|
Thread started: May 25 2007, 3:49 AM EDT
Watch
When comparing my drawings to that of the one in the book, I suppose my illustrations are more similar to the children's in the sense that our drawings are very colourful. Whereas the illustrations in the children's book are of dull shades and most likely purposely done this way.
|
|||||
| JoanneDietrich | Comparison of Wild Things | 0 | May 23 2007, 6:22 AM EDT by JoanneDietrich | ||
|
Thread started: May 23 2007, 6:22 AM EDT
Watch
I agree with Cathy's comments about the illustrations being bipeds rather than animal forms depicted in the story. Maybe it's because my children are more afraid of people than animals.
|
|||||
| (a7hy | Comparison of Wild Things ... | 0 | May 22 2007, 7:02 AM EDT by (a7hy | ||
|
Thread started: May 22 2007, 7:02 AM EDT
Watch
The illustrations by Sendak show a variety of types of wild things, but they are all bipeds - and so are the illustrations by Harriet and Cathy, their illustrations are also very colourful. Sendak's tend to be in shades of blue and grey. All appear to have big teeth - expectations of being eaten by them?
|
||||
Showing 3 of 3 threads for this page
